HEY!

CLICK HERE TO SEE THE HILARIOUS NEW EPISODE OF 8TH PERIOD!

Classical Music... a Punishment?

What this article says is that music can be used on a negative way. People don't really like the sound of classical, and it therefore drives them away. For example, a 7-eleven blasted Mozart in it's parking lot to get rid of unwanted loiterers. Also, a school in England actually used classical music as a punishment. When students misbehaved, they were forced to sit and listen to the music for an hour. And behavior increased 50%. If listening to classical music was a punishment, I wouldn't mind at all. I like classical music. For the most part, I disagreed with the article, until a few good points toward the end. It has a lot to do with presentation. If the music is screechy because of the poor speakers, a bad recording, or something of the like, it isn't going to be as enjoyable as listening to it surround sound or even better, live. If you pass through a terminal and hear music for a short amount of time, you don't really notice it. But, if you were to be staying in that terminal for a while, that music becomes more apparent.
For the most part, Anne Midgette is supporting the theory that classical music is used to filter out people from public spaces, and is used in a negative way. She starts the article out with a personal story that has made her realize this. After giving several informing pieces of evidence, she makes her argument clear. I don't think she wrote this for the argument, really. I think she wrote it for the sake of informing others.

Article: "Blasting Mozart to drive criminals away" by Anne Midgette

'Tis by Frank McCourt

So far, I really enjoy this book. I haven't really read much of it, but I really like what I have read. I know it's going to be about him trying to make it in New York, but the part about him in the church, I really like it. It's interesting to see how differently people valued religion. There were those who went all-out and sat in the front, but then there were the guys who were in the back, making fun of them. And now, people don't even bother to show up to church if they don't want to go.

The captain who wouldn't go down with the ship

You've all probably seen or heard about that cruise ship that hit a rock and sank. Yes, it was tragic. And it could have been stopped. Mainly because of that loser of a captain. I saw on the news that this guy went off course without informing his supervisors of his change, so they couldn't warn him about the dangers that lay ahead. What really makes me angry is that he's the one to make this mess, and yet he leaves the ship before announcing, "abandon ship" to the passengers, leaving them to figure things out for themselves. Now, that's pretty darn stupid. I remember, my first and only cruise in the summer of 2005, we had to do a drill where we got our life vests and report to our designated areas. It didn't really inform us as to what we were supposed to do after that. But that's because the captain, who wouldn't ditch, would tell us what measures would be taken based on the situation we were in. But, in this case, the passengers couldn't even rely on their captain. It's pretty sad. Now people are going to question whether they want to even go on a cruise in fear of the captain leaving them in a crisis. And on this ship, the crew didn't even know what to do. That's why so many people died.

I really like how the author set it up as a Q&A session with "the dean of ocean-liner historians" (Mashberg). His purpose was to inform others of what really happened, and to explain what is supposed to happen, as well as the after-effects with will occur. The guy left without warning, he was supposed to stay, and this event looks really bad on the cruise line. The author's argument is very valid, mainly because it's hard to disagree with him. I don't know of anyone who would stick up for the captain, because what he did was wrong (and fortunately, he's in jail now).


Article: The captain who wouldn't go down with the ship by Tom Mashberg

Watch This!!

EVERYONE NEEDS TO WATCH THIS VIDEO.

Another law that doesn't make sense

In New York, it is illegal to put your feet on a seat in a subway. Yes, you heard me. It's illegal. I find that law to be pretty dumb. I mean, it makes sense if it's rush hour or the subway is crowded. I get that. But if it is 3:10 am, and you happen to put your feet up, getting arrested for it seems pretty extreme. At the very most, give a ticket or something. In the article, it was said that a man with diabetes got arrested for briefly putting his feet on a subway seat after injecting his leg with insulin while riding a Manhattan subway to work. That's a bit too much. I feel that these people are getting arrested for the sake of getting arrested instead of actually displaying the goals of the enforcement.
I think the authors' goal was to communicate to their audience about how putting your feet up on a subway is illegal, and quite frankly, how ridiculous it is. They give specific instances on why the law is dumb, but also give examples on how it can be helpful. They define it as helpful when police officers arrest someone who just so happens to be wanted. But I kind of feel like it's just a coincidence.

Article: Relax, if You Want, but Don't Put Your Feet Up by Joseph Goldstein and Christine Haughney

America may be the most religious nation, but does that really have to do with anything?

Okay, so America is very religious. More than 90% of our population says they believe in God and pray regularly. But saying that you pray doesn't really mean anything. In the New Testament, "faith without works is dead". I actually found this fascinating that they bring this up because of our writing prompt about actions speaking louder than words. But anyways, this article was mainly about how we may be religious, but that doesn't mean anything. Poverty has risen to a record of 49.9 million people, or 16% of the U.S. population. 3.5 million Americans are homeless each year, and hinger in the United States has reached a 14-year high. After reading all of these statistics compiled into one article, I'll admit, it scared me. I couldn't help but think, if poverty and homelessness is this bad when I'm still a child, how bad will it be when I'm living on my own with a family to support? The article also states that "American restaurants toss out more than 6,000 tons of food every day," (Starr). I found this interesting. I know that restaurants should donate food they throw away. But I have learned that Dunkin' Donuts used to do that. They would give away any food they didn't sell in a day to the homeless. But they had to stop, after one person claimed that they got sick from eating the food Dunkin' Donuts so kindly donated. And he sued. So because of things like that, they aren't allowed to donate their food and are forced to throw it away.
Obviously, Bernard Starr's purpose is to inform. I didn't know more of half of these statistics. To inform more people about this would benefit others. I kind of think it's the author's goal to overwhelm the readers with how bad of a state our country is in. Because I was quite overwhelmed with the amount of statistics in the article. And pretty much, all I got out of it was: America is in bad, bad shape.

Article: So what if America is the most religious nation? by Bernard Starr